Surgically implanted and non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation: a review of efficacy, safety and tolerability
Ben‐Menachem E, Revesz D, Simon BJ, Silberstein S
European Journal of Neurology · 2015
Key finding
Review concludes both implanted and non-invasive VNS are generally safe and well tolerated, with the most common effects being voice alteration, cough and throat sensations that diminish over time.
Auto-extracted · verification pendingHow we verify
- Condition
- Safety
- Stimulation
- iVNS
- Evidence tier
- Narrative / Scoping Review
- Participants
- —
Share this study
Download the citation card as a PNG, or copy a link to this page.
Cite this study
Ben‐Menachem, E., Revesz, D., Simon, B. J., & Silberstein, S. (2015). Surgically implanted and non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation: a review of efficacy, safety and tolerability. European Journal of Neurology, 22(9), 1260-1268. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.12629
Related studies in Safety
The role of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation in chronic pain: from neurobiological mechanisms to clinical applications
Zhang et al. · Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026 · Systematic Review / Meta-Analysis
Systematic review for VNS vs. pharmaceutical modulations for multifaceted neurological disorder management through cross-case, network meta-analysis
Han et al. · Brain stimulation · 2025 · Systematic Review / Meta-Analysis
Efficacy of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (t-VNS) in treating drug-resistant epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Makkawi et al. · Epilepsy research · 2025 · Systematic Review / Meta-Analysis
Optimizing vagus nerve stimulation for Super Refractory Status Epilepticus: A case series and systematic review
Pichardo-Rojas et al. · Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2025 · Systematic Review / Meta-Analysis
Summary by Vagus Research. Always consult the primary source for the authoritative record.